A permanent protection order was granted by county court, but the District Court reversed, stating there were insufficient contacts to establish jurisdiction over the non-resident husband. The Supreme Court considered whether and when a civil protection order is available to a victim of alleged domestic abuse who comes to Colorado seeking refuge from a non-resident partner.
The court concluded that an out-of-state party’s harassment of, threatening of, or attempt to coerce an individual known by the non-resident to be located in Colorado, is a tortious act sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction under the state’s long-arm statute, C.R.S. § 13-1-124. The court also concluded that such conduct creates a sufficient nexus between the out-of-state party and Colorado to satisfy the requisite minimum contacts such that the exercise of jurisdiction by a Colorado court to enter a protection order comports with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
IRAs, 401(k) plans, and similar retirement accounts can play a crucial role in your financial…
The document that eventually made its way to federal prosecutors started the way a lot…
Lyons Gaddis is proud to announce that attorney Jennifer Spitz was included on the 2026…
Two Lyons Gaddis attorneys in Longmont are stepping into an unusual role this week, not…
Keith brings experience advising clients in complex civil disputes, with a focus on construction litigation,…
Today’s real estate market is testing conventional playbooks. Shifting capital conditions and heightened pressure on…