A permanent protection order was granted by county court, but the District Court reversed, stating there were insufficient contacts to establish jurisdiction over the non-resident husband. The Supreme Court considered whether and when a civil protection order is available to a victim of alleged domestic abuse who comes to Colorado seeking refuge from a non-resident partner.
The court concluded that an out-of-state party’s harassment of, threatening of, or attempt to coerce an individual known by the non-resident to be located in Colorado, is a tortious act sufficient to establish personal jurisdiction under the state’s long-arm statute, C.R.S. § 13-1-124. The court also concluded that such conduct creates a sufficient nexus between the out-of-state party and Colorado to satisfy the requisite minimum contacts such that the exercise of jurisdiction by a Colorado court to enter a protection order comports with traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice.
Lyons Gaddis is proud to announce that four attorneys have been recognized in the 2027…
Lyons Gaddis is pleased to announce the opening of its new Fort Collins office and…
Three Front Range projects, one quarter, three different outcomes. These projects tell an interesting story…
LONGMONT, Colo. — Lyons Gaddis is pleased to welcome James Duke to its Estate Planning…
LONGMONT, Colo. — Lyons Gaddis is pleased to welcome Catherine Fink to its Water Law…
IRAs, 401(k) plans, and similar retirement accounts can play a crucial role in your financial…