Categories: Litigation

Brevity is the Soul of Wit

As a litigator, it’s not often that I see a judge begin a District Court order by quoting Shakespeare; but reading the introduction in the Court’s Order in Sinclar v. Larson gave me the sneaking suspicion that this judge was about to make an example out of someone. This is not my case (thankfully), nevertheless, soon after the judge issued the order it found its way to my office, and I’m sure countless other attorneys’ offices – not to express a concept of law, but to emphasize an often-overlooked principle of legal writing: Brevity.

In the case, Sinclair’s attorney, who filed multiple briefs exceeding the 10-page limit without asking permission first, provoked Judge Taylor to take extreme action in striking 5 of Sinclair’s pending briefs. On the eve of trial, I can only imagine the impact of this order, which undoubtedly sent shivers down the spine of Sinclair’s lawyer. The order surely resulted in wasted attorney’s fees and court costs, and ultimately an unhappy client; and all because Sinclair’s briefs were not brief.

So, what can we learn from this Judge’s order?

First, prepare to get lambasted if you don’t follow the page limitations while practicing in front of Judge Taylor. Beyond that, however, I think there is a greater lesson. As quoted in the order, “brevity is an essential part of the art of advocacy.” Sinclair’s lengthy briefs, according to Judge Taylor, failed to preserve precious judicial resources. This judge, as with many judges, has over 300 other cases to manage, and he doesn’t have time to wade through unnecessary “legal fluff.”

Writing concisely is often easier said than done though; especially because litigation is complex and time is short. But effective advocates will find a way to produce briefs with clear and direct sentences that eliminate unnecessary words and phrases, remove redundancy, and apply the operative facts to the law. For your client’s sake, get to the point. The extra time it takes to produce quality briefs will make for better results and a happy client. Lastly, don’t take the court rules or the local rules lightly because some judges might actually enforce them.

Chad A. Kupper

Share
Published by
Chad A. Kupper

Recent Posts

SECTION 211: A NEW TOOL FOR LANDOWNERS AND DEVELOPERS DEALING WITH PROBLEMATIC OIL AND GAS WELLS

Northern Colorado has been home to an abundance of oil and gas development and drilling…

2 weeks ago

ALERT FOR BUSINESS OWNERS: Federal Judge Puts CTA on Hold, but only for some

The Business Attorneys at Lyons Gaddis have been advising our clients to take a slow…

2 months ago

A Brief Guide to the Federal Corporate Transparency Act – Compliance Required for Small Business Owners

By: Megan Henderson Starting January 1, 2024, if you own a small business or just…

6 months ago

The Changing Landscape of Landlord-Tenant Laws in Colorado

By: Brian L. Allard In 2023, the Colorado legislature passed seven bills related to residential…

6 months ago

PROFITS INTERESTS IN LLCs: A Tax-Friendly Alternative to Stock Options

Many small business clients find granting employees or key service providers a stake in the…

1 year ago

The Special District Association

The Special District Association (SDA) hosted its annual conference in Keystone in September 2022. In…

1 year ago